TUBS (Traumatic, Unidirectional, Bankart, Surgery) vs AMBRI (Atraumatic, Multidirectional, Bilateral, Rehab, Inferior capsular shift). Glenoid bone loss >20–25% → Latarjet (coracoid transfer) preferred over soft‑tissue Bankart alone. Engaging Hill‑Sachs lesions benefit from remplissage or bony procedures. Arthroscopic Bankart repair is standard for soft‑tissue instability with low bone loss; open has lower recurrence but more stiffness. CT with 3‑D en‑face view quantifies glenoid bone loss; MRI arthrogram for labral/capsular pathology.
What is the primary characteristic of TUBS (Traumatic, Unidirectional, Bankart, Surgery) shoulder instability?
Which of the following surgical procedures is preferred for glenoid bone loss greater than 20-25%?
What imaging modality is best for assessing labral and capsular pathology in shoulder instability?
What is the hallmark of an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion?
In which demographic is the recurrence risk after a primary anterior shoulder dislocation highest?
What does an ALPSA lesion refer to in shoulder instability?
What is the significance of measuring glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability?
Which of the following statements is true regarding the open Bankart repair technique?
Which structure is primarily responsible for restraining anterior translation of the humeral head?
What is a common complication associated with primary shoulder dislocations?
