The bone & joint journal | 2023 | Broida SE, Sullivan MH, Barlow JD, Morrey M
Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.
[Indexed for MEDLINE] Conflict of interest statement: J. D. Barlow reports personal and institutional royalties and consulting payments from Stryker, unrelated to this study. M. Houdek reports consulting payments from Link Orthopedics, unrelated to this study, and a leadership or fiduciary role in the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society, the Connective Tissue Oncology Society, and the Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration. P. S. Rose reports a leadership or fiduciary role in the International Society of Limb Salvage, the Sacral Tumor Study Group, and the Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. J. Sanchez-Sotelo reports grants from Stryker, royalties from Stryker, Oxford University Press, and Elsevier, consulting payments from Stryker, Acumed, and Exactech, speaker payments from the Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, a leadership or fiduciary role in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and stock or stock options in Precision OS, Orthobullets, and PSI, all of which are unrelated to this study. E. Wagner reports consulting fees from Stryker, Zimmer Biomet, Acumed, and Osteoremedies, all of which are unrelated to this study. 19. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Mar;(204):9-24. A system of staging musculoskeletal neoplasms. Enneking WF. A system for staging benign and malignant musculoskeletal lesions is presented. This system, first devised at the University of Florida in 1977, was based on data assembled from 1968 through 1976. It was field tested by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society and published in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research in 1980. In the ensuing five years, the system has undergone refinement. It has recently been adapted by the American Joint Committee Task Force on Bone Tumors and proposed by them to the International Union Against Cancer (IUCC) for international usage. Based upon histologic grade (G), anatomic site (T), and presence or absence of metastases (M), it describes the progressive stages, irrespective of histogenesis, that assess the progressive degrees of risk to which the patient is subject. This system articulates well with current radiologic techniques of staging and serves as a useful guide in the selection of an appropriate definitive surgical procedure. Its usage permits comparative end result studies on the effect of surgical and nonsurgical methods of management.
This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.
This article has not been linked to a case yet.
This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.