Orthonotes
Orthonotes
by the.bonestories
v3.5 Fusion Pro
v3.5 Fusion Pro
PubMed Systematic Review / Meta-analysis Evidence High

Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation in the management of subtrochanteric femur fractures: a meta-analysis.

Clinical interventions in aging | 2015 | Liu P, Wu X, Shi H, Liu R

In-App Reader

Open Source

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Source
PubMed
Type
Systematic Review / Meta-analysis
Evidence
High

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 18. J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Apr;29 Suppl 4:S28-33. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000287. Reducing subtrochanteric femur fractures: tips and tricks, do's and don'ts. Yoon RS(1), Donegan DJ, Liporace FA. Author information: (1)*Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY; and †Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Treatment of subtrochanteric fracture remains a challenge, but evolution of strategy has allowed for reliable results with low complications. Although several fixation options exist, reamed, antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN) has evolved as the standard of care. Cognizant effort to achieve anatomic reduction before IMN passage allows for desired outcomes. Several reduction techniques can be used to overcome the deforming forces present in the proximal femur to allow for proper IMN placement. The purpose of this article is to review the tips, tricks, and pitfalls to avoid in the treatment of subtrochanteric femur fractures with IMN. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000287

Linked Wiki Topics

This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.

Linked Cases

This article has not been linked to a case yet.

Linked Atlases

This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.