Early results of a novel modular knee arthrodesis implant after uncontrolled periprosthetic knee joint infection.

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no competing interests. 19. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jul;31(7):1529-38. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.054. Epub 2016 Mar 31. Soft Tissue Reconstruction and Flap Coverage for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Rao AJ(1), Kempton SJ(2), Erickson BJ(1), Levine BR(1), Rao VK(2). Author information: (1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. (2)Division of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin. BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty is a successful operation for treatment of arthritis. However, devastating wound complications and infections can compromise the knee joint, particularly in revision situations. METHODS: Soft tissue loss associated with poor wound healing and multiple operations can necessitate the need for reconstruction for wound closure and protection of the prosthesis. RESULTS: Coverage options range from simple closure methods to complex reconstruction, including delayed primary closure, healing by secondary intention, vacuum-assisted closure, skin grafting, local flap coverage, and distant microsurgical tissue transfer. CONCLUSION: Understanding the advantages and pitfalls of each reconstructive option helps to guide treatment and avoid repeated operations and potentially devastating consequences such as knee arthrodesis or amputation. Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.054