Modes of failure of hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture.

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] Conflict of interest statement: Competing interests: T. Tung and E. Trepman received fellowship support from the Concordia Foundation, DePuy Synthes, and Smith & Nephew. T. Gascoyne, E. Bohm, C. Burnell, D. Hedden, and T. Turgeon have received institutional funding from DePuy, Smith & Nephew, Zimmer Biomet, Hip Innovation Technology, and Össur. E. Bohm is a consultant to Stryker Canada and declares receiving payment for expert testimony from the Government of British Columbia. He is also an editorial board member of The Bone and Joint Journal. C. Burnell reports travel reimbursement from Hip Innovation Technology. D. Hedden was a paid consultant for Smith & Nephew. No other competing interests were declared. 5. J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 18;12(8):2946. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082946. Update on Shoulder Arthroplasties with Emphasis on Imaging. Weaver JS(1), Omar IM(2), Chadwick NS(1), Shechtel JL(1), Elifritz JM(3)(4), Shultz CL(5), Taljanovic MS(3)(6). Author information: (1)Department of Radiology and Radiologic Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave. S, MCN CCC-1118, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. (2)Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, 676 N. Saint Clair Street, Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. (3)Department of Radiology, MSC08 4720, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA. (4)Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico, New Mexico Office of the Medical Investigator, MSC08 4720, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA. (5)Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of New Mexico, MSC 10 5600, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA. (6)Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, 1501 N. Campbell, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA. Shoulder pain and dysfunction may significantly impact quality of life. If conservative measures fail, advanced disease is frequently treated with shoulder arthroplasty, which is currently the third most common joint replacement surgery following the hip and knee. The main indications for shoulder arthroplasty include primary osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, inflammatory arthritis, osteonecrosis, proximal humeral fracture sequelae, severely dislocated proximal humeral fractures, and advanced rotator cuff disease. Several types of anatomic arthroplasties are available, such as humeral head resurfacing and hemiarthroplasties, as well as total anatomic arthroplasties. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasties, which reverse the normal ball-and-socket geometry of the shoulder, are also available. Each of these arthroplasty types has specific indications and unique complications in addition to general hardware-related or surgery-related complications. Imaging-including radiography, ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and, occasionally, nuclear medicine imaging-has a key role in the initial pre-operative evaluation for shoulder arthroplasty, as well as in post-surgical follow-up. This review paper aims to discuss important pre-operative imaging considerations, including rotator cuff evaluation, glenoid morphology, and glenoid version, as well as to review post-operative imaging of the various types of shoulder arthroplasties, to include normal post-operative appearances as well as imaging findings of complications. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12082946 PMCID: PMC10143235