Orthonotes
Orthonotes
by the.bonestories
v3.0 Fusion
v3.0 Fusion
PubMed Systematic Review / Meta-analysis Evidence High

Clinical effectiveness of Enneking appropriate versus Enneking inappropriate procedure in patients with primary osteosarcoma of the spine: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society | 2020 | Pombo B, Cristina Ferreira A, Cardoso P, Oliveira A

In-App Reader

Open Source

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Source
PubMed
Type
Systematic Review / Meta-analysis
Evidence
High

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 3. J Neurosurg Spine. 2024 Sep 27;41(6):708-715. doi: 10.3171/2024.5.SPINE231401. Print 2024 Dec 1. Intentional Enneking-inappropriate surgery and high-energy particle therapy for unresectable osteogenic sarcoma of the spine: a retrospective study. Evangelisti G(#)(1), Falzetti L(#)(1), Altorfer FCS(2), Bandiera S(1), Barbanti Brodano G(1), Cianchetti M(3), Fiore MR(4), Palmerini E(5), Schwab JH(6), Boriani S(7), Gasbarrini A(1)(8). Author information: (1)1Department of Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy. (2)2University Spine Center Zürich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Switzerland. (3)3Department of Proton Therapy, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy. (4)7National Centre for Oncological Treatment, CNAO, Pavia, Italy. (5)4Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Oncology, Orthopaedic Institute Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy. (6)5Orthopaedic Spine Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. (7)6GSpine4, Orthopaedic Institute Galeazzi, Milan, Italy; and. (8)8Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy. (#)Contributed equally OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of intralesional gross-total resection (GTR) followed by high-energy particle therapy with en bloc and intralesional resections. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients diagnosed with primary osteogenic sarcoma (OGS) of the spine between 2009 and 2020 was conducted. Demographic information, including age, affected site, tumor volume, and Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini stage, was collected. Additionally, information on metastases at diagnosis, length of stay, operating time, complications, planned surgical treatment, and radiotherapy was also collected. Outcome measures, including local recurrence (LR) and disease-specific survival (DSS), were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: In total, 20 patients with a median age of 38 (IQR 23-60) years were included. The median follow-up was 15.7 (IQR 6.3-36.9) months. Eight patients underwent en bloc resection with a 38% (3 patients) LR rate and a median DSS of 26.4 months. Four patients received adjuvant high-energy particle therapy after planned GTR. Their median follow-up was 36 months; none of these patients experienced LR. Both the 1-year and 3-year DSSs were 100%. Another 8 patients underwent intralesional resection. Six of the 8 patients (75%) died of their disease, with a median survival of 7.3 (IQR 4.7-14) months. CONCLUSIONS: GTR combined with adjuvant high-energy particle therapy appears to be a safe and effective alternative approach for patients with OGS of the spine when en bloc resection is not feasible. The results demonstrated a 3-year DSS of 100% and no major surgical complications. DOI: 10.3171/2024.5.SPINE231401

Linked Wiki Topics

This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.

Linked Cases

This article has not been linked to a case yet.

Linked Atlases

This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.