Success rates and factors associated with failure of temporary anchorage devices: A prospective clinical trial.

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 9. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Feb;72(2):E46-53. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182244027. A biomechanical investigation of the effects of static fixation and dynamization after interlocking femoral nailing: a finite element study. Shih KS(1), Hsu CC, Hsu TP. Author information: (1)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China. BACKGROUND: Interlocking nail systems have been widely used to treat long bone fractures. The use of an interlocking nail system with a static fixation technique or a dynamic fixation technique was evaluated according to the outcomes of clinical applications. The biomechanical characteristics of dynamic fixation techniques are unclear, and the surgical rule, involving the removal of the locking screws farthest from the fracture site, is based mainly on surgeons' experiences. There has been no study that investigated the biomechanical characteristics of dynamic fixation techniques and the validity of this surgical rule. METHODS: Three-dimensional nonlinear finite element models were developed. The conventional static fixation technique and two types of dynamic fixation techniques (removal of the proximal screw or removal of the distal screws) for the repair of two types of fractures (a proximal femoral fracture or a distal femoral fracture) are discussed. RESULTS: The results show that the dynamic fixation techniques could significantly reduce the stress exerted by the interlocking nail system and produce a greater contact pressure at the fracture site as compared with that of the static fixation technique. The interlocking nail system with removal of the distal screws resulted in greater contact area than that with removal of the proximal screw for the proximal femoral fracture. Similarly, the interlocking nail system with removal of the proximal screw had larger contact area than that with removal of the distal screws for the distal femoral fracture. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study could help surgeons to understand the biomechanical characteristics of dynamic fixation techniques and provide evidence to support the use of a specific dynamic fixation technique. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182244027