Orthonotes
Orthonotes
by the.bonestories
v3.0 Fusion
v3.0 Fusion
PubMed Narrative Review Evidence Moderate

Custom Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Journal unavailable | 2020 | Rivière C, Vendittoli PA, Belzile EL, Angers M

In-App Reader

Open Source

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Source
PubMed
Type
Narrative Review
Evidence
Moderate

Abstract

10. Bone Joint J. 2020 Mar;102-B(3):365-370. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B3.BJJ-2019-1153.R1. Patient-specific planning in shoulder arthroplasty. Min KS(1), Fox HM(1), Bedi A(2), Walch G(3), Warner JJP(1). Author information: (1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. (2)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. (3)Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France. AIMS: Patient-specific instrumentation has been shown to increase a surgeon's precision and accuracy in placing the glenoid component in shoulder arthroplasty. There is, however, little available information about the use of patient-specific planning (PSP) tools for this operation. It is not known how these tools alter the decision-making patterns of shoulder surgeons. The aim of this study was to investigate whether PSP, when compared with the use of plain radiographs or select static CT images, influences the understanding of glenoid pathology and surgical planning. METHODS: A case-based survey presented surgeons with a patient's history, physical examination, and, sequentially, radiographs, select static CT images, and PSP with a 3D imaging program. For each imaging modality, the surgeons were asked to identify the Walch classification of the glenoid and to propose the surgical treatment. The participating surgeons were grouped according to the annual volume of shoulder arthroplasties that they undertook, and responses were compared with the recommendations of two experts. RESULTS: A total of 59 surgeons completed the survey. For all surgeons, the use of the PSP significantly increased agreement with the experts in glenoid classification (x2 = 8.54; p = 0.014) and surgical planning (x2 = 37.91; p < 0.001). The additional information provided by the PSP also showed a significantly higher impact on surgical decision-making for surgeons who undertake fewer than ten shoulder arthroplasties annually (p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: The information provided by PSP has the greatest impact on the surgical decision-making of low volume surgeons (those who perform fewer than ten shoulder arthroplasties annually), and PSP brings all surgeons in to closer agreement with the recommendations of experts for glenoid classification and surgical planning. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(3):365-370. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B3.BJJ-2019-1153.R1

Linked Wiki Topics

This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.

Linked Cases

This article has not been linked to a case yet.

Linked Atlases

This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.