Orthonotes
Orthonotes
by the.bonestories
v3.0 Fusion
v3.0 Fusion
PubMed Narrative Review Evidence Moderate

Monteggia fracture dislocations: a historical review.

The Journal of hand surgery | 2014 | Rehim SA, Maynard MA, Sebastin SJ, Chung KC

In-App Reader

Open Source

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Source
PubMed
Type
Narrative Review
Evidence
Moderate

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 2. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):4085-4093. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04576-1. Epub 2022 Sep 3. Monteggia fractures and Monteggia-like-lesions: a systematic review. Weber MM(1), Rosteius T(2), Schildhauer TA(2), Königshausen M(2), Rausch V(3). Author information: (1)Department of General and Trauma Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, BŸrkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany. marcmax.weber@gmail.com. (2)Department of General and Trauma Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, BŸrkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany. (3)Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. Monteggia injuries are rare, but severe injuries of the elbow including various injury patterns. Treatment of these injuries is still topic of debate and strategies differ widely. In this systematic review on Monteggia injuries in adults, we aimed to clarify the incidence of different injury patterns within Monteggia injuries, investigate the main reasons leading to revision surgery and explore which surgical treatments should be favored to achieve satisfactory clinical results.We initially identified 182 publications and ultimately included 17 retrospective studies comprising 651 cases. All patients were classified using the Bado classification, leading to 30.5% Bado type I fractures, 60.4% type II fractures, 5.1% type III and 3.1% type IV fractures. Mean revision rate was 23%. Ulna non-union (28%) and limited range-of-motion (22%) are the main reasons for revision surgery. Meta-analysis shows a trend toward the use of locking plates for ulna fixation which may lead to less revision surgery and fewer ulna non-unions. Further biomechanical and clinical research is necessary to clarify the role of radial head surgery. © 2022. The Author(s). DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04576-1 PMCID: PMC10293342

Linked Wiki Topics

This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.

Linked Cases

This article has not been linked to a case yet.

Linked Atlases

This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.