Pediatric supracondylar fractures and pediatric physeal elbow fractures.

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 19. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016 Feb;24(2):e21-3. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00701. Management of Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures With Vascular Injury. Sanders JO(1), Heggeness MH, Murray JN, Pezold RC, Sevarino KS. Author information: (1)From the University of Rochester, Rochester, NY (Dr. Sanders), the University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita, KS (Dr. Heggeness), and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, IL (Mr. Murray, Mr. Pezold, and Ms. Sevarino). The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has developed the Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) document Management of Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures With Vascular Injury. Evidence-based information, in conjunction with the clinical expertise of physicians, was used to develop the criteria to improve patient care and obtain the best outcomes while considering the subtleties and distinctions necessary in making clinical decisions. The AUC clinical patient scenarios were derived from patient indications that generally accompany a pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture with vascular injury, as well as from current evidence-based clinical practice guidelines and supporting literature. The 6 patient scenarios and 18 treatments were developed by the Writing Panel, a group of clinicians who are specialists in this AUC topic. Next, the Review Panel, a separate group of volunteer physicians, independently reviewed these materials to ensure that they were representative of patient scenarios that clinicians are likely to encounter in daily practice. Finally, the multidisciplinary Voting Panel (made up of specialists and nonspecialists) rated the appropriateness of treatment of each patient scenario using a 9-point scale to designate a treatment as Appropriate (median rating, 7 to 9), May Be Appropriate (median rating, 4 to 6), or Rarely Appropriate (median rating, 1 to 3). DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00701