Evaluating Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared to Conventional Methods: A Systematic Review of the Literature in the United States.

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 2. Cureus. 2023 Dec 20;15(12):e50852. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50852. eCollection 2023 Dec. Robotic-Assisted Knee Arthroplasty: Insights and Implications From Current Literature. Yasen Z(1)(2), Woffenden H(3), Robinson AP(4). Author information: (1)Trauma and Orthopedics, Royal Free Hospital, London, GBR. (2)Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, GBR. (3)Trauma and Orthopedics, Ministry of Defence, Portsmouth, GBR. (4)Trauma and Orthopedics, Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, London, GBR. Robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty has emerged as a promising development, aiming to enhance surgical precision and patient outcomes. This literature review examines the clinical efficacy, cost implications, environmental impact, and potential of telesurgery in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) and robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RAUKA) relative to conventional techniques. A thorough literature search was conducted across medical databases. Clinical and radiological outcomes of RATKA and RAUKA were extracted and analyzed. Direct costs, operating time, surgeon learning curve, environmental implications, and the futuristic concept of telesurgery were also considered. Subjective patient assessments such as WOMAC, Oxford Knee Score, and SF-36, alongside objective measures like HSS score and KSS, were commonly used. Radiological parameters like hip-knee-ankle (HKA) and femorotibial angle provided insights into post-operative alignment. Evidence indicated sporadic high-level design studies, often with limited samples. Cost remains a major constraint with robotic systems, though high-volume cases might offset expenses. Environmental assessments revealed robotic surgeries generate a higher carbon footprint. Telesurgery, an evolving field, could transcend geographical boundaries but is not without challenges, including high costs, latency issues, and cyber threats. While robotic-assisted surgeries may hold promise in the future, substantial barriers, including acquisition costs, potential surgeon deskilling, and environmental concerns, need addressing. Greater robot utilization may drive costs down with more competitors entering the market. Continued research, especially multi-center RCTs, is pivotal to solidifying the role of robotic systems in knee arthroplasty. Copyright © 2023, Yasen et al. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.50852 PMCID: PMC10798799