Orthonotes
Orthonotes
by the.bonestories
v3.0 Fusion
v3.0 Fusion
PubMed Original Article Evidence Unclassified

Cemented versus Cementless Femoral Fixation for Elective Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Analysis of Short-Term Complication and Readmission Rates.

Journal of clinical medicine | 2023 | Chen XT, Christ AB, Chung BC, Ton A

In-App Reader

Open Source

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Source
PubMed
Type
Original Article
Evidence
Unclassified

Abstract

Conflict of interest statement: N.D.H. is a paid consultant for MicroPort Orthopedics and Intellijoint Surgical. A.B.C. is a paid consultant for Smith and Nephew and Intellijoint Surgical. No other conflict of interest to report by the remaining authors. 14. Bone Joint J. 2015 Feb;97-B(2):185-91. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.34331. Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using radiostereometric analysis: a randomised controlled trial. Kendrick BJ(1), Kaptein BL(2), Valstar ER(2), Gill HS(3), Jackson WF(1), Dodd CA(1), Price AJ(1), Murray DW(1). Author information: (1)NDORMS, University of Oxford, Windmill Road, OX3 7LD, UK. (2)Biomechanics and Imaging Group, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands. (3)University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK. The most common reasons for revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are loosening and pain. Cementless components may reduce the revision rate. The aim of this study was to compare the fixation and clinical outcome of cementless and cemented Oxford UKAs. A total of 43 patients were randomised to receive either a cemented or a cementless Oxford UKA and were followed for two years with radiostereometric analysis (RSA), radiographs aligned with the bone-implant interfaces and clinical scores. The femoral components migrated significantly during the first year (mean 0.2 mm) but not during the second. There was no significant difference in the extent of migration between cemented and cementless femoral components in either the first or the second year. In the first year the cementless tibial components subsided significantly more than the cemented components (mean 0.28 mm (sd 0.17) vs. 0.09 mm (sd 0.19 mm)). In the second year, although there was a small amount of subsidence (mean 0.05 mm) there was no significant difference (p = 0.92) between cemented and cementless tibial components. There were no femoral radiolucencies. Tibial radiolucencies were narrow (< 1 mm) and were significantly (p = 0.02) less common with cementless (6 of 21) than cemented (13 of 21) components at two years. There were no complete radiolucencies with cementless components, whereas five of 21 (24%) cemented components had complete radiolucencies. The clinical scores at two years were not significantly different (p = 0.20). As second-year migration is predictive of subsequent loosening, and as radiolucency is suggestive of reduced implant-bone contact, these data suggest that fixation of the cementless components is at least as good as, if not better than, that of cemented devices. ©2015 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.34331

Linked Wiki Topics

This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.

Linked Cases

This article has not been linked to a case yet.

Linked Atlases

This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.