A predictive score of high tibial osteotomy survivorship to help in surgical decision-making: the SKOOP score.

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 20. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Apr 22;24(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06403-z. Surgical interventions for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a network meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Bin G(#)(1)(2), Jinmin L(#)(1), Cong T(#)(1), Yuchen T(1), Xiaohui Z(1)(2), Yayi X(3)(4)(5). Author information: (1)Department of Orthopaedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China. (2)Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Orthopaedics, Lanzhou, Gansu, China. (3)Department of Orthopaedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China. xiayayildey@163.com. (4)Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Orthopaedics, Lanzhou, Gansu, China. xiayayildey@163.com. (5)Lanzhou University Second Hospital, #82 Cuiyingmen, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, China. xiayayildey@163.com. (#)Contributed equally BACKGROUND: Multiple surgical interventions exist for the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis, but the surgeon and patient may often have difficulty deciding which interventions are the best option. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared complications, revisions, reoperations, and functional outcomes among TKA (total knee arthroplasty), UKA (unicompartmental knee arthroplasty), HTO (high tibial osteotomy), BCA (bicompartmental knee arthroplasty), BIU (bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty), and KJD (knee joint distraction). The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were reviewed for all studies comparing two or more surgical interventions. Direct-comparison meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) were performed to combine direct and indirect evidence. The risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs. RESULTS: This NMA and systematic review included 21 studies (17 RCTs), with a total of 1749 patients. The overall risk-of-bias assessment of the RCTs revealed that 7 studies had low risk, 5 had some concerns, and 9 had high risk. SUCRA (the surface under the cumulative ranking curve) rankings revealed that KJD had the greatest risk of appearing postoperative complications, revisions, and reoperations, and UKA or TKA had the lowest risk. The majority of comparisons among various treatments showed no difference for functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: Each surgical intervention is noninferior to other treatments in functional outcomes, but UKA and TKA are better options to treat OA according to SUCRA rankings by comparing complications, revisions, and reoperations. KJD is an imperfect option for treating OA. Other treatments should be carefully considered for each patient in accordance with their actual conditions. However, this conclusion is limited by the selection of reviewed publications and individual variation of surgical indications for patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with Research Registry (reviewregistry1395). © 2023. The Author(s). DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06403-z PMCID: PMC10122318