Exercise for treating patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] Conflict of interest statement: Study selection, data collection and risk of bias assessment of Van Linschoten 2009 were conducted by review authors who were not study investigators of this trial. Rianne A van der Heijden: none declared.
 Nienke E Lankhorst: none declared.
 Robbart van Linschoten: none declared.
 Sita MA Bierma‐Zeinstra: none declared.
 Marienke van Middelkoop: none declared. 4. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021 Dec;14(6):406-412. doi: 10.1007/s12178-021-09730-7. Epub 2021 Oct 29. Physical Examination and Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome: an Updated Review. Kasitinon D(1)(2), Li WX(3), Wang EXS(3), Fredericson M(3). Author information: (1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. donald.kasitinon@gmail.com. (2)Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. donald.kasitinon@gmail.com. (3)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) accounts for 25 to 40% of all knee disorders. Diagnosis of PFPS is primarily based on history and physical examination, but the findings on physical examination are often subtle and do not consistently correlate with symptoms described. Yoon and Fredericson published a review article in 2006 detailing the physical examination maneuvers most frequently used to assist clinicians in the accurate diagnosis and treatment of PFPS, and our aim in this review is to provide an update on this previous article focusing on the literature published over the past 15 years regarding the topic. RECENT FINDINGS: Since publication of Fredericson's original review article, there have been studies building on the literature specifically surrounding Q angle, patellar tilt, crepitus, strength and functional testing, and physical examination maneuver clustering. Additionally, multiple studies have been conducted on the use of musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) as a diagnostic tool for PFPS. Recent literature has further supported Q angle (when measured utilizing a standardized protocol), crepitus, weakness of hip abductors and extensors, and weakness detected in functional testing as predictors of PFPS while finding inconsistent evidence behind lateral patellar tilt as a predictor of PFPS. The reliability of most physical examination tests alone remain low, but clustering physical examination findings may provide better sensitivities and specificities in diagnosing PFPS. Musculoskeletal US is rapidly gaining popularity, and decreased vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) volume, asymmetry in gluteus medius thickness, intra-articular effusions, and quadriceps and patellar tendon thicknesses have shown value in diagnosing those with PFPS. Additionally, US has the advantage of providing dynamic examination as well as evaluation of the patellofemoral joint in newborns and infants as a predictor of future patellofemoral instability. Further studies are needed to establish the gold standard for diagnosing PFPS and what US findings are truly predictive of PFPS. © 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-021-09730-7 PMCID: PMC8733121