Is Pauwels classification still valid?

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 3. Z Orthop Unfall. 2010 Mar;148(2):191-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1240588. [Actual relevance of Pauwels' classification of femoral neck fractures--a critical review]. [Article in German] Schwarz N(1). Author information: (1)Unfallkrankenhaus, Klagenfurt, Osterreich. nikolaus.schwarz@auva.at AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of Pauwels' classification of femoral neck fractures. METHOD: A study of literature was performed. RESULTS: It has never been proven that the inclination of the fracture plane has a prognostic relevance. A number of papers prove the contrary, there are no publications where Pauwels' classification has been used successfully in selecting treatment modalities. Pauwels' theory of fracture inclination angle has not been transferred into clinical practice. This discrepancy probably goes back to the fact that the angle cannot be determined preoperatively, that in the majority of femoral neck fractures the angle is within the range of 40 to 60 degrees, that the theoretical angle variations do practically not exist, and that the shearing forces are reduced to an unknown amount by friction resistance due to the uneven fracture plane. The mechanical laws of the pseudarthrosis of the femoral neck cannot be extrapolated to acute fractures. CONCLUSION: The theory of Pauwels has apparently no clinical relevance for the majority of acute fractures, except for the rare transcervical fractures, and should not be considered any longer as a classification of acute femoral neck fractures due to the lack of prognostic and therapeutic relevance. DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1240588