Outcome of symptomatic upper lumbar disc herniation.

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 3. HSS J. 2020 Jul;16(2):130-136. doi: 10.1007/s11420-019-09723-w. Epub 2019 Oct 30. Etiology-Based Classification of Adjacent Segment Disease Following Lumbar Spine Fusion. Louie PK(1), Harada GK(1), Sayari AJ(1), Mayo BC(2), Khan JM(1), Varthi AG(3), Yacob A(4), Samartzis D(1), An HS(1). Author information: (1)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St., Suite 300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA. (2)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL USA. (3)Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA. (4)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA USA. BACKGROUND: Adjacent segment disease (ASDz) is a potential complication following lumbar spinal fusion. A common nomenclature based on etiology and ASDz type does not exist and is needed to assist with clinical prognostication, decision making, and management. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The objective of this study was to develop an etiology-based classification system for ASDz following lumbar fusion. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 65 consecutive patients who had undergone both a lumbar fusion performed by a single surgeon and a subsequent procedure for ASDz. We established an etiology-based classification system for lumbar ASDz with the following six categories: "degenerative" (degenerative disc disease or spondylosis), "neurologic" (disc herniation, stenosis), "instability" (spondylolisthesis, rotatory subluxation), "deformity" (scoliosis, kyphosis), "complex" (fracture, infection), or "combined." Based on this scheme, we determined the rate of ASDz in each etiologic category. RESULTS: Of the 65 patients, 27 (41.5%) underwent surgery for neurogenic claudication or radiculopathy for adjacent-level stenosis or disc herniation and were classified as "neurologic." Ten patients (15.4%) had progressive degenerative disc pathology at the adjacent level and were classified as "degenerative." Ten patients (15.4%) had spondylolisthesis or instability and were classified as "instability," and three patients (4.6%) required revision surgery for adjacent-level kyphosis or scoliosis and were classified as "deformity." Fifteen patients (23.1%) had multiple diagnoses that included a combination of categories and were classified as "combined." CONCLUSION: This is the first study to propose an etiology-based classification scheme of ASDz following lumbar spine fusion. This simple classification system may allow for the grouping and standardization of patients with similar pathologies and thus for more specific pre-operative diagnoses, personalized treatments, and improved outcome analyses. © Hospital for Special Surgery 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s11420-019-09723-w PMCID: PMC7253547