Thoracolumbar spine trauma: review of the evidence.

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 3. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jun 12;21(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03386-z. Healing pattern classification for thoracolumbar burst fractures after posterior short-segment fixation. Liang C(1), Liu G(2), Liang G(3), Zheng X(1), Yin D(1), Xiao D(1), Zeng S(1), Cai H(2), Chang Y(4). Author information: (1)Spine departement, Orthopedic center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), 510080, No.106, Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China. (2)Orthopedic department, Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, Huizhou City, China. (3)Spine departement, Orthopedic center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), 510080, No.106, Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China. liangguoyan@gdph.org.cn. (4)Spine departement, Orthopedic center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), 510080, No.106, Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China. changyunbing@gdph.org.cn. BACKGROUND: Thoracolumbar burst fractures can be treated with posterior short-segment fixation. However, no classification can help to estimate whether the healed vertebral body will have sufficient stability after implant removal. We aimed to develop a Healing Pattern Classification (HPC) to evaluate the stability of the healed vertebra based on cavity size and location. METHODS: Fifty-two thoracolumbar burst fracture patients treated with posterior short-segmental fixation without fusion and followed up for an average of 3.2 years were retrospectively studied. The HPC was divided into 4 types: type I - no cavity; type II - a small cavity with or without the violation of one endplate; type III - a large cavity with or without the violation of one endplate; and type IV - a burst cavity with the violation of both endplates or the lateral cortical shell. The intraobserver and interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the HPC were assessed. The demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes of the cohort were compared between the stable group (types I and II) and the unstable group (types III and IV). Logistic regression was conducted to evaluate risk factors for unstable healing. RESULTS: The intraobserver and interobserver ICCs of the HPC were 0.86 (95% CI = 0.74-0.90) and 0.77 (95% CI = 0.59-0.86), respectively. While the unstable healing group (types III and IV) accounted for 59.6% of the patients, most of these patients were asymptomatic. The preoperative Load Sharing Classification (LSC) comminution score may predict the occurrence of unstable healing (OR = 8.4, 95% CI = 2.4-29.7). CONCLUSIONS: A reliable classification for assessing the stability of a healed vertebra was developed. With type I and II healing, the vertebra is considered stable, and the implant can be removed. With type III healing, the vertebra may have healing potential, but the implant should not be removed unless type II healing is achieved. With type IV healing, the vertebra is considered extremely unstable, and instrumentation should be maintained. Assessing the LSC comminution score preoperatively may help to predict unstable healing after surgery. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03386-z PMCID: PMC7291420