Orthonotes
Orthonotes
by the.bonestories
v3.5 Fusion Pro
v3.5 Fusion Pro
PubMed Systematic Review / Meta-analysis Evidence High

Management, complications and clinical results of femoral head fractures.

Injury | 2009 | Giannoudis PV, Kontakis G, Christoforakis Z, Akula M

In-App Reader

Open Source

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Source
PubMed
Type
Systematic Review / Meta-analysis
Evidence
High

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 9. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2026 Jun 13;36(1):232. doi: 10.1007/s00590-026-04821-y. Femoral head fractures systematic review and meta-analysis. Marshall SC(1)(2), Li J(2), Leary EV(2), Bischoff CJ(2), Garlapaty AR(2), Crist BD(3). Author information: (1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Oklahoma, Norman, United States. (2)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, United States. (3)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, United States. cristb@health.missouri.edu. OBJECTIVE: Femoral head fractures are rare, high-energy injuries with a relatively high complication rate. This study evaluated the femoral head fracture literature published since the systematic review in 2009 and determined changes in: classification systems, management of these injuries, and the associated adverse outcomes. METHODS: A PubMed search from January 2009 to January 2025 was performed. Terms associated with femoral head fractures were entered. Meta-analysis was performed for the pooled proportion of patients who experienced adverse outcomes in the evaluated studies. Heterogeneity between studies was tested using the Q test and, if significant, random effect models were applied. Confidence intervals from individual studies and stabilized pooled proportions are reported. RESULTS: Twenty-two articles met inclusion criteria. All the studies supplied the mechanism of injury as well as patient age and sex. The most common mechanism of injury was traffic accidents in all the 22 studies with many of the injured middle-aged men. The Pipkin classification was used in 86.4% of studies. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and fragment excision were the two most common surgical techniques used. Adverse outcomes for patients included heterotopic ossification, post-traumatic osteoarthritis, and avascular necrosis with rates from 9 to 37%, across studies. For the rate of adverse outcomes, heterogeneity between studies was identified using a random effects model. CONCLUSION: Since 2009, the Pipkin classification system remains the most often used for femoral head fractures and ORIF is the most common treatment method. Although femoral head fractures are rare, the adverse outcome rate following injury is extremely high (35%). However, no relationships between fracture type, treatment type, and favorable outcome were identified. © 2026. The Author(s). DOI: 10.1007/s00590-026-04821-y PMCID: PMC13264563

Linked Wiki Topics

This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.

Linked Cases

This article has not been linked to a case yet.

Linked Atlases

This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.