BMC musculoskeletal disorders | 2022 | Berthold DP, Muench LN, Dyrna F, Mazzocca AD
Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.
[Indexed for MEDLINE] Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. 3. Zentralbl Chir. 2002 Mar;127(3):203-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-24255. [AC Joint Injuries]. [Article in German] Bosch U(1), Fremerey RW. Author information: (1)Unfallchirurgische Klinik, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany. bosch.ulrich@mh-hannover.de There is still controversy about the treatment for acute type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation according to Tossy and Rockwood's classification. Good functional results were reported on following operative and non-operative treatment. According to the literature the functional outcome is similar. Following surgical repair, however, complications occur more often and the period of rehabilitation is longer. The disadvantages of non-operative treatment include a higher rate of a persisting prominence of the distal clavicle. Currently available data in the literature indicate that based on the criteria of evidence based medicine non-operative treatment seems to represent the method of choice for type III injuries of the acromioclavicular joint. DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-24255
This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.
This article has not been linked to a case yet.
This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.