Orthonotes
Orthonotes
by the.bonestories
v3.5 Fusion Pro
v3.5 Fusion Pro
PubMed Narrative Review Evidence Moderate

The journey to preventing dislocation after total hip arthroplasty : how did we get here?

The bone & joint journal | 2022 | Wright-Chisem J, Elbuluk AM, Mayman DJ, Jerabek SA

In-App Reader

Open Source

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Source
PubMed
Type
Narrative Review
Evidence
Moderate

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 19. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Oct 28;19(1):698. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05199-5. MAKO robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty: a comprehensive meta-analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes. Llombart-Blanco R(1), Mariscal G(2), Barrios C(3), Vera P(3), Llombart-Ais R(3)(4). Author information: (1)Orthopedic Surgery Department, University Clinic of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. (2)Institute for Research on Musculoskeletal Disorders, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Valencia, Carrer de Quevedo, 2, Valencia, 46001, Spain. Gonzalo.mariscal@mail.ucv.es. (3)Institute for Research on Musculoskeletal Disorders, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Valencia, Carrer de Quevedo, 2, Valencia, 46001, Spain. (4)Traumacenter, La Salud Hospital, Valencia, Spain. BACKGROUND: Introduction: Robotic surgery in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has emerged as a promising approach for improving precision and reducing errors. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted MAKO total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Studies were searched using four databases. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4. Efficacy was assessed radiologically, and functional scores and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Twelve studies (1224 hips) were analyzed. The MAKO group achieved greater cup anteversion (MD 1.53, 95%CI 1.04-2.03) and a higher percentage of components within safe inclination and anteversion ranges (p > 0.05). Harris Hip Scores did not differ significantly (MD 0.61, 95%CI -0.22-1.45) but the forgotten joint scores favored MAKO (MD 5.99, 95% CI 4.10-7.88), although not exceeding the minimally clinically significant difference. No differences in intraoperative complications emerged (OR 0.96, 95%CI 0.51-1.79) but preoperative plans significantly mismatched the final cup placement after MAKO (p 

Linked Wiki Topics

This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.

Linked Cases

This article has not been linked to a case yet.

Linked Atlases

This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.