Orthonotes
Orthonotes
by the.bonestories
v3.0 Fusion
v3.0 Fusion
PubMed Narrative Review Evidence Moderate

MR Imaging of Knee Arthroplasty Implants.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc | 2015 | Fritz J, Lurie B, Potter HG

In-App Reader

Open Source

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Source
PubMed
Type
Narrative Review
Evidence
Moderate

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 14. J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jan;37(1):162-167. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.09.012. Epub 2021 Sep 28. Varus Collapse in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Fixation or Bone Fail First? Cox ZC(1), Green CC(1), Otero JE(1), Mason JB(1), Martin JR(2). Author information: (1)OrthoCarolina Hip and Knee Center, Charlotte, NC. (2)Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. INTRODUCTION: Aseptic tibial loosening is now considered the most common reason that total knee arthroplasties (TKA) fail long term. There are unique subsets of patients that fail into varus alignment of the tibial tray with collapse of the medial proximal tibia. It is currently unknown if the implant fixation fails first or if the proximal medial tibia collapses first. MATERIALS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 88 patients that were revised at our institution secondary to aseptic varus collapse of the proximal tibia. Two fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons performed a retrospective analysis on sequential precollapse radiographs in each patient to determine which failed first: the implant fixation (implant-cement or cement-bone interface) or the medial proximal tibia. DISCUSSION: 36/88 (40.9%) patients had a series of precollapse radiographs that could be reviewed. Failure at the implant-cement interface before varus collapse in 23 vs 22 patients, failure at the implant-cement and cement-bone interface before varus collapse in two patients, and contemporaneous failure at the implant-cement interface and varus collapse in 11 vs 12 patients were identified by reviewers one and two, respectively. CONCLUSION: The most frequent mechanism of failure identified was failure of the implant-cement interface followed by subsequent medial tibial varus collapse. Improving implant fixation may decrease the incidence of this unique failure mechanism. We advocate the use of supplemental stem fixation in high-risk patients and optimal cement techniques for all patients as methods of potentially avoiding tibial varus collapse, one of the most frequent modes of long-term failure. Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.09.012

Linked Wiki Topics

This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.

Linked Cases

This article has not been linked to a case yet.

Linked Atlases

This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.