Orthonotes
Orthonotes
by the.bonestories
v3.0 Fusion
v3.0 Fusion
PubMed Narrative Review Evidence Moderate

Patellofemoral arthroplasty, where are we today?

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA | 2012 | Lustig S, Magnussen RA, Dahm DL, Parker D

In-App Reader

Open Source

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Source
PubMed
Type
Narrative Review
Evidence
Moderate

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 11. Bone Jt Open. 2023 Dec 15;4(12):948-956. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.412.BJO-2023-0100.R1. Should we recommend patellofemoral arthroplasties to patients? Vella-Baldacchino M(1), Webb J(2), Selvarajah B(2), Chatha S(2), Davies A(3), Cobb JP(1), Liddle AD(1). Author information: (1)MSk Lab, Imperial College London, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Sir Michael Uren Hub, London, UK. (2)Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK. (3)Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK. AIMS: With up to 40% of patients having patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis (PFJ OA), the two arthroplasty options are to replace solely the patellofemoral joint via patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA), or the entire knee via total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to assess postoperative success of second-generation PFAs compared to TKAs for patients treated for PFJ OA using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and domains deemed important by patients following a patient and public involvement meeting. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE via OVID, CINAHL, and EBSCO were searched from inception to January 2022. Any study addressing surgical treatment of primary patellofemoral joint OA using second generation PFA and TKA in patients aged above 18 years with follow-up data of 30 days were included. Studies relating to OA secondary to trauma were excluded. ROB-2 and ROBINS-I bias tools were used. RESULTS: A total of nine studies were included, made up of four randomized controlled trials (domain 1) and five cohort studies (domain 2). PROMs and knee function specific scores developed for reporting TKA were unable to detect any difference between PFA and TKA. There was no significant difference in complications between PFA and TKA. PFAs were found to have a better postoperative range of motion. CONCLUSION: TKA and PFA are both viable options for patients with primary PFJ OA. Over time, we have seen an emphasis on patient satisfaction and better quality of life. Recommending sacrificing healthy medial and lateral compartments to treat patellofemoral joint arthritis should be given further thought. © 2023 Vella-Baldacchino et al. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.412.BJO-2023-0100.R1 PMCID: PMC10721344

Linked Wiki Topics

This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.

Linked Cases

This article has not been linked to a case yet.

Linked Atlases

This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.