[Revision TKA due to instability: diagnostics, treatment options and outcomes].

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Abstract

[Indexed for MEDLINE] 5. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 May;446:149-60. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000214415.83593.db. Patellofemoral instability after total knee arthroplasty. Eisenhuth SA(1), Saleh KJ, Cui Q, Clark CR, Brown TE. Author information: (1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA. Despite advances in surgical technique and implant design, complications involving the extensor mechanism and patellofemoral joint after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) continue to be the most common cause of pain and the most commonly cited reason for revision TKA surgery. A thorough understanding of the etiologies of patellofemoral instability, careful preoperative planning, and meticulous surgical techniques will optimize clinical outcome. Evaluation of patellofemoral stability should begin in the operating room. Postoperatively, thorough history, physical examination, and dedicated radiographic studies should be obtained. Computed tomography scan is the most accurate and reliable way to assess component positioning. Treatment of patellofemoral instability is directed by its etiology. Revision of one or both components is indicated if malpositioning is present. If the components are determined to be in satisfactory positions, soft tissue procedures can be pursued. Future advancements in prosthetic design and the routine use of computer-assisted navigation systems will minimize patellofemoral instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level V (expert opinion). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000214415.83593.db