Orthonotes
Orthonotes
by the.bonestories
v3.0 Fusion
v3.0 Fusion
PubMed Systematic Review / Meta-analysis Evidence High

Operative Treatment of Nonprimary Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review.

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine | 2024 | Correia Cardoso R, Andrade R, Monteiro I, Machado C

In-App Reader

Open Source

Journal and index pages often block iframe embedding. This reader keeps the evidence details in Orthonotes and leaves the source page one click away.

Source
PubMed
Type
Systematic Review / Meta-analysis
Evidence
High

Abstract

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this contribution. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto. 18. Indian J Orthop. 2021 Jan 26;55(2):252-262. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00355-z. eCollection 2021 Apr. Managing Chondral Lesions: A Literature Review and Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines. Banerjee S(1), Sahanand KS(2). Author information: (1)Department of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan 342001 India. (2)Ortho-One Orthopedic Speciality Centre, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641005 India. BACKGROUND: Articular cartilage lesions are becoming increasingly common. Optimum diagnosis and management of chondral defects cause a lot of dilemma. A number of surgical methods have been reported in the literature for treating focal cartilage defects. There is a lack of consensus on the most effective management strategy, with newer surgical and cell-based treatments being advocated regularly. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A clinical review is constructed by appraising the published literature about clinical evaluation and diagnostic modalities for articular cartilage defects and subsequent surgical procedures, management strategies employed for such lesions. Prominent available databases (PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane) were also searched for trials comparing functional outcomes following cartilage procedures. Synthesis of a practical management guideline is then attempted based on the evidence assessed. RESULTS: Systematic examination and optimal use of diagnostic imaging are an important facet of cartilage defect management. Patient and lesion factors greatly influence the outcome of cartilage procedures and must be considered while planning management. Smaller lesions  4 cm2, newer generation autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) has shown promising and durable results. Stem cells with scaffolds may provide an alternate option. Orthobiologics are a useful adjunct to the surgical procedures, but need further evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Most treatment modalities have their role in appropriate cases and management needs to be individualized for patients. The search for the perfect cartilage restoration procedure continues. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00355-z PMCID: PMC8046678

Linked Wiki Topics

This article has not been linked to a wiki topic yet.

Linked Cases

This article has not been linked to a case yet.

Linked Atlases

This article has not been linked to an atlas yet.